Morgan Freeman and His Wife Have Finalized Their Divorce

Morgan Freeman is one of my favorite black stars. He is an American actor, film director, and narrator. Freeman has received Academy Award nominations for his performances in "Street Smart", "Driving Miss Daisy", "The Shawshank Redemption" and "Invictus" and won the Best Supporting Actor in 2005 for "Million Dollar Baby".

Today, I want to show a news story about him. I read it online. The title of the story is "Attorney: Morgan Freeman, Wife Finalize Divorce". It is a transmitted story, being published on Wtop.com. You can read the story here. The title of original story was "Actor Morgan Freeman and His Wife Have Finalized Their Divorce in Mississippi", which was published on 17 September 2010 on Los Angeles Times web site. The writer is Jack Elliott.

In terms of content, the story is about Freeman and his wife Myrna Colley-Lee divorcing in Mississippi. Firstly, the story points out that the issue happened on 15 September. The attorney William R. Wright told The Associated Press, "It was done without a trial and terms of the divorce are sealed.". Also, the story mentions that Freeman and Colley-Lee had separated in December 2007 and the divorce was filed under seal in July 2008. In addition, the story points out why Freeman and Colley-Lee live in Mississippi now. Besides, the story refers to Freeman's car accident in 2008. Finally, the story introduces Freeman's achievement. Although the story provides much relevant information, the structure of the story seems to be unclear.

Actually, in 2008, some news stories indicated Freeman and his wife divorcing after 24 years. Here is an example. Compared with some stories in 2008, the story seems more reliable and authentic, because the sources of the story stem from Morgan's legal representation Wright.

Lastly, the online page has the main story and a picture of Freeman. There is no message area where readers can make comments on the event. Also, it has not releted link which can help readers to obtain more useful information.

P.S.

The couple married on 6 June 16 1984. Unfortunately, a marriage can not be retained by a more-than-20-year accompany.

Katherine Jackson Sues AEG over Michael’s Death

 

As a fans of Michael Jackson, I have paid much attention to the stories of his death,because I suspect that his sudden death is a conspiracy. When I read the two news stories online, my eyes could not remove. The title of one story is "Katherine Jackson Sues AEG over Michael Jackson's Death" which was published on 15 September 2010 on TMZ web site. This story is written by TMZ staff. You can read the story here. The other one is "Michael Jackson's Family Sues Concert Promoters over Death" which was published on 16 September 2010 on Telegraph web site. The writer is Nick Allen. Here is the link. 

In terms of content, both of the stories are about Michael's mother Katherine suing AEG over Michael's death. Firstly, in the suit, Katherine claimed AEG's contract with Michael "created a legal duty for AEG to act reasonably toward the physical well-being of Michael Jackson", but the AEG Live group of negligence breach of contract, because AEG hired Dr Conrad Murray without a proper background check. Secondly, the suit also alleges AGE caused emotional distress to Michael's son Prince because he witnessed his father suffering and dying. In addition, both of the stories points out London concert director Kenny Ortega is one of defendants. Compared with the former story, the later one also says, "According to the lawsuit, Michael appeared drugged and disoriented at rehearsals and was shivering on the day before his death, but AEG did not alter his 'grueling schedule'". Obviously, the second story has more details than the first one.

In the matter of values, both of the stories have timeliness, reliability and authenticity. Besides, it can be predicted that an increasing number of people will pay attention to the issue after reading the stories, because Michael Jackson as the King of Pop, has a huge number of fans.

Finally, Both of the online pages have photos, related links and message areas. One thing to be mentioned is that the former page provides the link of the original lawsuit, which can satisfy the readers who want to know the details. 


P.S.

My views--the reasons of AEG murdering Michael Jackson

Reason 1

AEG spent a huge sum of money on the insurance of Michael Jackson's "Final Curtain Call" concert at London's O2 Arena. The insurance policy covered everything, even including death by overdose. If Michael Jackson died, AEG will receive compensation about $17.5 million.

Reason 2

AEG invested $15 million in Michael Jackson's rehearsal and video the process of rehearsal. Since there would be a real concert in the future, why AEG took such a big price to shoot the rehearsal video? Is it just a coincidence--Michael Jackson died on the day after finishing the first complete rehearsal? No! It is a conspiracy. If Michael Jackson died, AEG could gain great profits from the rehearsal video. As a matter of fact that AEG received $60 million from video deal after he died.

Reason 3

Why 10 concerts added to 50 at London's O2 Arena? Who hope to sell more tickets in order to earn more money from the grueling 50 concerts which can not be completed? The worth of tickets is totally $50 million. If the concerts were successful, the considerable part of ticket sales would be given to Michael Jackson. By contrast, if Michael Jackson could not perform, AEG did not need to pay anything to him and acquire $50 million. Maybe you think that AEG will bear the loss, if funs refund their tickets. However, when you think carefully, you will find that most funs would not refund the tickets. AEG of course has thought about that and will adopt some measure. Actually, AEG took the measure--the original tickets can be replaced by stamps.

Reason 4

Michael Jackson has been confirmed to die from homicide. On February 8, 2010, his private docto--Murray was charged with involuntary manslaughter by prosecutors in Los Angeles. Why Murray killed Michael Jackson? There is no personal grudge between them. However, it is worth noting that Murray is provided by AEG.

Victoria and David Beckham's New Advertisement

Victoria and David Beckham is an enviable couple who have been deeply attached to each other since they started dating in 1997. From then, their names are often appeared together on the media. In fact, people do not speak about their relationship anymore. They talk about "Brand Beckham". Several days ago, a new advertisement led them into the focus again.

You  can watch the advertisement here.

The news story is about the advertisement. I read it online. The title is "Lipgoss: Brand Beckham and Cringe Worthy Celeb Ads", which was published on 10 September 2010 on TVNZ web site. This story was written by Anna Hart. Here is the link.

In terms of content, the story shows, "Victoria and David Beckham have amassed a whopping $235 million by sticking together through thick and thin, in sickness and in health" at first. Then, it illustrates the design concept of advertisement which is about a new his-and-hers fragrance set called Intimately Yours -- "capture the essence of David and Victoria Beckham's passion and the power of their relationship". Finally, the story describes the smell of Intimately Yours—"an interesting aroma" and "the fifth fragrance duo released by the couple". I think the structure is very ingenious, because the story takes "the essence of David and Victoria Beckham's relationship"as the main line.

Moreover, the story has certain values, because Victoria and David Beckham are not only superstars in their respective fields, but also they are a perfect couple. Their stories often attract widespread concern.

Besides, the online page has the main story, an image of the couple and a video of the advertisement. But there is no message area where readers can express their opinions unreservedly and relevant links which are able to help readers to know more information.

To be frank, the description of the smell of Intimately Yours in the story in deed arouses my interest.